Malmo is Sweden ’s 3rd largest city and a major epicenter of the Islamization of Europe. Wide-open immigration policies have changed Sweden and have made Malmo, which is now one-quarter Muslim, one of the most racially divided cities in Europe.Most Muslim immigrants are concentrated in one district, where the male unemployment rate is 82 percent. Crime affects one of three families in the city and rape has tripled in 20 years, according to the Christian Broadcasting Network.
From NewsMax.
Probably just more of what most of us are aware of, but I found it interesting.
Here in the US, politicians are lax with immigration for the purpose of getting votes. Dems cater specifically to illegals while reps are stupidly scared to step in the way for fear of repelling those votes. Not that it should matter, because illegals don’t carry the right to vote. But that doesn’t stop more liberal voting precincts and special interest groups, does it?
Do you all think it’s reasonable to believe that lax immigration policies could cause the doom of Europe? What about here in the states? I seem to come across many different stories here and there about these issues, and more and more I see it as a reasonable grounds for concern in the loss of a nation.
Last 5 posts by Sci Fi Samurai
- Glenn Beck- Inconvenient Debt - March 5th, 2009
- Sick mob urged 17 year old to jump - January 16th, 2009
- Woman mugged, letter “B” carved into her face… - October 24th, 2008
- Diablo III unveiled! - June 28th, 2008
- More demands from Islam - February 28th, 2008
About the author. Beloved by millions yet remaining a dark mystery, Sci-Fi Samurai can only ever drink half a can of coke. A whole can is just too much. Widely acknowledged as the worldwide authority on the life and times of Marty Feldman. Read more from this author
I have two points to make:
1. There is great precedent in America for limiting the number of immigrants by their backgrounds, skills and/or origins. In the past America had a quota of immigrants they would allow into the country. For example, they would limit the number of Italian immigrants to 150,000 or some such number. I believe at one point the American goverment declared a moratorium on new Irish immigrants, on the simple basis that there were already more Irish in NYC than in Ireland, and that we didn’t need any more unskilled laborers.
Now, I’m of Irish stock, and this doesn’t bother me whatsoever.
Obviously if you were an Irish rocket scientist, then yeah, they would likely make an exception, as they should. It’s perfectly normal and rational for immigration policy to serve the best interests of the nation. Part of the reason why they limited the numbers of immigrants back then is that they had to courage to defend their own culture. They took in as many immigrants as they believe could be ‘acculturated’ to their new host culture. We need to continue to allow Muslims to come into Western countries, but it should be controlled and monitored. I know a few Muslims from Africa and they’re nothing like the Muslims from the Middle East. I would be willing to name a few countries as ‘problem’ nations and not allowing immigrants from that country, or of a particular ’sect’ of Islam.
And if they don’t like it, tough crap. There’s always Sweden!
Heck in most other countries you can’t even get in unless you have loads of money in a bank and/or have a skill that the host country would prefer.
Go look at the immigration standards for moving to Australia or New Zealand, Sam, and you’ll be shocked at the list of prerequisites.
2. We need to stop illegal immigration in America, period. If that means building a wall, a moat, or an army of T-1000’s to patrol the southern border turning illegal Mexican bordercrossers into a pile of cinders with a plasma rifle, then fine. It’s got to stop.
Instead, we have racial demagoguery turning this into claims of xenophobia. I love immigrants, I’m the grandchild of immigrants. All Americans, real Americans, LOVE IMMIGRANTS…. but they also believe in the rule of law. We have borders for a reason.