Obama Pushes for Expanded Powers

Ok, now I’m really scared.

Tuesday, March 24, 2009; A01

The Obama administration is considering asking Congress to give the Treasury secretary unprecedented powers to initiate the seizure of non-bank financial companies, such as large insurers, investment firms and hedge funds, whose collapse would damage the broader economy, according to an administration document.

The government at present has the authority to seize only banks.

Ok, so now the government can use taxation to ‘undo’ legal but unpopular contracts (see AIG bonuses) and now they will have the right to seize companies outright? Where are the armies of hyperventilating liberal idiots who said Bush was trying to make himself an evil fascist overlord now, huh? Where did they go? If you’ve got a company that’s related to finance, watch how you run your company, because if it becomes politically expedient for Barack Obama to nationalize your company, he can and will. This is full-bore socialism.

Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner is set to argue for the new powers at a hearing today on Capitol Hill about the furor over bonuses paid to executives at American International Group, which the government has propped up with about $180 billion in federal aid. Administration officials have said that the proposed authority would have allowed them to seize AIG last fall and wind down its operations at less cost to taxpayers.

Only a fool would actually believe that the federal government would do a better job at crashing these companies. The government is partly to blame in the first place! And this is not about saving investors, this is about saving the owners of these businesses. They won’t be protesting this action (at first) because it will be better than having a golden parachute — it will mean that as long as they are profitable the profits will remain privatized, but once the company starts to fail the losses will become socialized, extending onto the backs of taxpayers.

The administration’s proposal contains two pieces. First, it would empower a government agency to take on the new role of systemic risk regulator with broad oversight of any and all financial firms whose failure could disrupt the broader economy. The Federal Reserve is widely considered to be the leading candidate for this assignment. But some critics warn that this could conflict with the Fed’s other responsibilities, particularly its control over monetary policy.

‘Systemic risk regulator’? We already have a system for that in place - it’s called the free market.
If this goes through, people, America is doomed. DOOMED.

The government also would assume the authority to seize such firms if they totter toward failure.

Where would we draw the line on ‘tottering’? Is a public outcry enough? Would a heartfelt speech by a senator do the trick? All this will accomplish in the long-term is expanding the role of government, and in the short term delay the recovery. The Democrats’ prescription for the economy’s case of temporary walking pneumonia is terminal socialistic brain cancer.

Besides seizing a company outright, the document states, the Treasury Secretary could use a range of tools to prevent its collapse, such as guaranteeing losses, buying assets or taking a partial ownership stake. Such authority also would allow the government to break contracts, such as the agreements to pay $165 million in bonuses to employees of AIG’s most troubled unit.

We’re privatizing profits and socializing the risk.
I’ll say it again - under the Democrats this nation is DOOMED.
No, I’m not joking.

Last 5 posts by Krogenar

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit

About the author.  Krogenar is one of the admins of BuriedPlanet, and is contiguous with all space and time. Small children and animals trust him. When he mails letters without postage… they still get delivered. Read more from this author


4 Responses to “Obama Pushes for Expanded Powers”


  1. 1 JavenNo Gravatar

    We the People let them do it. The Government says if you own a house and someone comes along and says we want to build a super-duper-10 lane express highway through your 150 year old house ancestors house and property, they can seize it and build their super-duper strip mall too.

    And yet, the People won’t rise up. Why? A lot of the stuff Obama really wants to do is on the down low. But he will try to do them because he is a smooth-jive-talker who has people duped on his real agenda. This bank thing is only the beginning.

  2. 2 KrogenarNo Gravatar

    Quote

    And yet, the People won’t rise up. Why? A lot of the stuff Obama really wants to do is on the down low. But he will try to do them because he is a smooth-jive-talker who has people duped on his real agenda. This bank thing is only the beginning.

    Between you and me, Javen, I think once Obama starts ‘jive-talking’ then people really will rise up in revolution. That’ll be the last straw.

    ’smooth-jive-talker’ … LOL! Thank you Javen, that brightened my day considerably. :D

    As far as ‘We the People’ having elected Che Barack, it’s funny you point that out, because that’s his point as well. When asked if they felt that they had a mandate from the people to radically expand the scope of government, ramp up the deficit and muck up the economy, their reply was:

    “We won.”

    Quote

    President Barack Obama’s honeymoon period seems to have ended quickly. That’s because Mr. Obama doesn’t grasp the essentials of presidential leadership. Rather than making a compelling case for his economic policies, he has resorted to curt rebuffs, such as telling House Republican whip Eric Cantor, “I won.” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said the same thing the same day: “We won the election; we wrote the [stimulus] bill.” This is the trope of a party that has lost its ability to make an argument.

    True dat!

    ;)

  3. 3 JavenNo Gravatar

    You’re/They’re correct. The people have spoken and gave permission to the administration to do whatever.

    I’d like to dedicate a song to Krog by the BeeGees.

    “Its just your jive talkin
    Youre telling me lies, yeah
    Jive talkin
    You wear a disguise
    Jive talkin
    So misunderstood, yeah
    Jive talkin
    You really no good”

  4. 4 KrogenarNo Gravatar

    Thank you Javen.

    Oh, in other news of the Obama-engineered doomsday economy, China and Russia have both been calling for a new ‘world’ currency to replace the American dollar. Geithner recently said the following about the Chinese suggestion of a new currency:

    Quote

    Geithner, at the Council on Foreign Relations, said the U.S. is “open” to a headline-grabbing proposal by the governor of the China’s central bank, which was widely reported as being a call for a new global currency to replace the dollar, but which Geithner described as more modest and “evolutionary.”

    “I haven’t read the governor’s proposal. He’s a very thoughtful, very careful distinguished central banker. I generally find him sensible on every issue,” Geithner said, saying that however his interpretation of the proposal was to increase the use of International Monetary Fund’s special drawing rights — shares in the body held by its members — not creating a new currency in the literal sense. The continued use of the dollar as a reserve currency, he added, “depends..on how effective we are in the United States…at getting our fiscal system back to the point where people judge it as sustainable over time.”

    It should be noted that when you’re the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury that you need to be careful what you say. Markets have tumbled since Geithner put his foot in his mouth. White House economic adviser Austan Goolsbee had an exchange with Wolf Blitzer recently, as reported by ‘The Weekly Standard’:

    Quote

    BLITZER: The Chinese suggesting today, this dollar, U.S. dollar, should be replaced as international currency, because they are beginning to have concerns that you are printing, the U.S. government is simply printing too many of these dollars and will lose its value as an international currency.

    What’s your reaction?

    GOOLSBEE: It strikes me as probably unlikely.

    Different people have in the past argued for world currencies or new — new currencies before. I believe the U.S. at this point is the safest place to invest in the world. And it’s likely to remain that the dollar is a critical currency in the years ahead.

    BLITZER: So, you — you don’t like some new international currency that some Chinese are proposing?

    GOOLSBEE: Well, look…

    BLITZER: I assume that’s right, right?

    GOOLSBEE: I haven’t seen the details of what they are proposing.

    I mean, the dollar is the dollar. If people don’t want to buy it, they don’t buy it. But I think you have seen sort of a flight to the dollar in — in times of trouble.

    Meanwhile, Obama himself has flatly rejected a new ‘world’ currency. So what’s going on? Is this just more bumbling from the Obamatons, or are we seeing a trial balloon being floated?

Leave a Reply

You must login to post a comment.






Buried Planet is using WP-Gravatar